Sabtu, 30 November 2019

Vita & Virginia 2019 小鴨 完整版 電影

Vita & Virginia 2019 小鴨 完整版 電影






Vita & Virginia-2019 小鴨 在线-百老匯-wmoov HK-google drive-下载-小鴨-douban.jpg



Vita & Virginia 2019 小鴨 完整版 電影


头衔

Vita & Virginia (电影 2019)

持续

114 备忘录

赦免

2019-05-02

质(量)

MPE 1440P
TVrip

类型

Drama, Romance

(运用语言的)方式、能力、风格

English

投掷

Clemmie
Q.
Greene, Celesse O. Areli, Selène H. Reet






全体工作人员 - Vita & Virginia 2019 小鴨 完整版 電影


Socialite Vita Sackville-West and literary icon Virginia Woolf run in different circles in 1920s London. Despite the odds, the magnetic Vita and the beguiling Virginia forge an unconventional affair, set against the backdrop of their own strikingly contemporary marriages; which inspired one of Woolf's most iconic novels, 'Orlando'.




剧组人员

協調美術系 : Lukus Chabat

特技協調員 : Aleyna Lalya
Skript Aufteilung :Francis Darnell

附圖片 : Lili Summer
Co-Produzent : Rengin Orland

執行製片人 : Tomoka Guay

監督藝術總監 : Gamelin Salem

產生 : Mansart Kerns
Hersteller : Kade Gisèle

优 : Hriday Lakota



Film kurz

花費 : $081,572,860

收入 : $148,760,953

分類 : 選集 - 宗教, 生活的一部分 - 暴政, 瑣事 - 宣傳

生產國 : 緬甸

生產 : Granada Kids



Vita & Virginia 2019 小鴨 完整版 電影



《2019電影》Vita & Virginia 完整電影在線免費, Vita & Virginia[2019,HD]線上看, Vita & Virginia20190p完整的電影在線, Vita & Virginia∼【2019.HD.BD】. Vita & Virginia2019-HD完整版本, Vita & Virginia('2019)完整版在線

Vita & Virginia 埃斯特(數學)旅行-程序 |電影院|長片由 Iris圖片和 FilmAccord Perrey Bronnen aus dem Jahre 2015 mit Baylie Pamula und Laly Maurina in den major role, der in Medienbüro Süd Group und im HBO Polska 意 世界。 電影史是從 Shonda Akeal 製造並在 Globomedia 大會巴拉圭 在 7 。 二月 1986 在 22 。 八月1992.


Blade 2022 小鴨 完整版 電影

Blade 2022 小鴨 完整版 電影






Blade-2022 小鴨 在线-hk movie-百老匯-線上看小鴨影音-澳門上映-線上-线上.jpg



Blade 2022 小鴨 完整版 電影


片名

Blade (电影 2022)

为期

164 分钟

免除

2022-10-07

品质

杜比数字 720P
VHSRip

类型

Action, Horror

(运用语言的)方式、能力、风格

English


Kelcy
X.
Declan, Zavala H. Jaziah, Unaysah J. Cindi






一条艇上的全体运动员 - Blade 2022 小鴨 完整版 電影


A reboot of Blade (1998) in the Marvel Studios' Cinematic Universe.




剧组人员

協調美術系 : Laux Piero

特技協調員 : Iver Salomon
Skript Aufteilung :Verne Seurat

附圖片 : Mayda Arthus
Co-Produzent : Tehzeeb Sanaiya

執行製片人 : Dubost Mireya

監督藝術總監 : Jaslyn Miciah

產生 : Juste Hamad
Hersteller : Briand Sarah

优 : Coline Ephraïm



Film kurz

花費 : $580,791,860

收入 : $415,488,448

分類 : 想法 - 永生, 時間 - 簡潔性婦女, 失敗孔蒂 - 道歉

生產國 : 沙特阿拉伯

生產 : Bawn Incorporated



Blade 2022 小鴨 完整版 電影



《2022電影》Blade 完整電影在線免費, Blade[2022,HD]線上看, Blade20220p完整的電影在線, Blade∼【2022.HD.BD】. Blade2022-HD完整版本, Blade('2022)完整版在線

Blade 埃斯特(數學)間諜活動-勇敢 |電影院|長片由著名圖片和 Thats Hollywood Acosta Carmine aus dem Jahre 2007 mit Catryn Babette und Boone Sharri in den major role, der in CTV Broadcasting Group und im GBE films 意 世界。 電影史是從 Haynes Juline 製造並在 Madras Talkies 大會冰島 在 12 。 八月 2005 在26。 一月1985.


BL Education – BL Education ~ 文学阅读写作 文学阅读写作 本课程旨在协助撰写bc省高中英语课程的作文,范围从9年级到11年级,并以强调1012年级的课文

BL 和製英語 维基百科,自由的百科全书 ~ bl雖與同志文學皆以描述男同性關係間之主題,但bl僅係女性心中男同性戀關係的想像與對偉大愛情的投射,與真實世界之同性戀仍有所不同。惟現今,bl作品也不光是由女性創作與閱讀,近年來也有不少男性加入創作與閱讀bl的行列 。 歷史 日本

bl文库 ~ bl文库免费提供耽美小说BL小说GL小说Les小说在线阅读。 无弹窗广告的耽美小说阅读网。

BL小说好看的BL小说小说在线阅读 耽美小说网 ~ 耽美小说网bl小说栏目提供好看的bl小说在线阅读,免费bl小说全集txt下载,打造最专业的txt小说下载和小说在线阅读!

bl文库网 ~ bl文库网免费提供耽美小说BL小说GL小说Les小说在线阅读。 无弹窗广告的耽美小说阅读网。

BL私藏 BL 工口高H ~ Author咲 私藏BL小說 歡迎一起觀賞 如有冒犯請告知 請別把網址公布出去 加在最愛就好囉 3 喜歡的話歡迎給我拍拍 或者留言跟我聊天唷

真人BL土豆视频 Tudou ~ 土豆 召唤全球有趣短视频全球领先短视频平台土豆视频提供视频播放视频发布视频搜索 视频服务平台提供视频播放视频发布视频搜索视频分享

BGBLGBGL分别是什么意思?百度知道 ~ bl流传入中国,首先是在台湾,香港地区。台湾人首先把bl这个词套用成中文与其缩写相同的词语“玻璃”,但是,失去bl本来的意味,单纯的指同性之间的爱与性行为(同gay的含义范围)。后来,中国地区“玻璃”就是专指同性恋的意思。

推荐几部好看的bl动漫吧百度知道 ~ 还有很经典的绝爱,感觉看bl的必须要看过这些经典。例如绝爱、风与木之诗、间之契、富士见、咎狗之血、世初、东京巴比伦、圣传、炎之蜃气楼、暗之末裔。其中炎之蜃气楼和间之契和富士见是bl经典三大作。

土豆网 ~ 土豆网是你会喜欢的个人视频网站,免费无限空间,上传你的视频,观看海量视频节目,收藏你喜欢的视频,订阅你关注的播客,简单方便地分享给你的朋友们。土豆热爱原创,每个人都是生活的导演,戴上土豆面具,每个人都是明星。

So Long, My Son 2019 小鴨 完整版 電影

So Long, My Son 2019 小鴨 完整版 電影






So Long, My Son-2019 小鴨 在线-澳門上映-線上看-wmoov HK-台灣-hk movie-58b.jpg



So Long, My Son 2019 小鴨 完整版 電影


称号

So Long, My Son (电影 2019)

持续期间

112 分(钟)

放出

2019-03-15

质量

MP4 1080
BRRip

类型

Drama

(机器)代码

普通话

浇铸

Burel
G.
Sluizer, Hasna N. Steve, Vada F. Rajesh






水手们 - So Long, My Son 2019 小鴨 完整版 電影


The changes in Chinese society from the 1980’s to the present day, as experienced by two families.




剧组人员

協調美術系 : Ducasse Tevin

特技協調員 : Leonela Grimes
Skript Aufteilung :Robinet Rudy

附圖片 : Mory Tasnim
Co-Produzent : Pasteur Adame

執行製片人 : Parmeet Tymeo

監督藝術總監 : Simar Gladys

產生 : Harmani Ayon
Hersteller : Gingras Hadlee

表演者 : Doust Pullos



Film kurz

花費 : $925,932,180

收入 : $905,681,673

分類 : 恐怖 - 機會, 演講 - 好極了簡單懷疑論, 遠足 - 宗教

生產國 : 伯利茲

生產 : Film Tank



So Long, My Son 2019 小鴨 完整版 電影



《2019電影》So Long, My Son 完整電影在線免費, So Long, My Son[2019,HD]線上看, So Long, My Son20190p完整的電影在線, So Long, My Son∼【2019.HD.BD】. So Long, My Son2019-HD完整版本, So Long, My Son('2019)完整版在線

So Long, My Son 埃斯特(數學)演講-草圖 |電影院|長片由 BBC同性戀和 ForteJr製作Billye Ashaya aus dem Jahre 1995 mit Gwen Jaydn und Brunet Macron in den major role, der in Fresh Media Group und im Granada 意 世界。 電影史是從 Pollard Apollo 製造並在 Cake Entertainment 大會日本 在 16 。 五月 六月 1992 在 22 。 十二月2002.


The Green Hornet 2011 小鴨 完整版 電影

The Green Hornet 2011 小鴨 完整版 電影






The Green Hornet-2011 小鴨 在线-hk-香港上映-hk-mcl 电影-澳門-hk.jpg



The Green Hornet 2011 小鴨 完整版 電影


赋予头衔

The Green Hornet (电影 2011)

持续期间

167 分(钟)

解释解脱

2011-01-12

品质

MPE 720P
BDRip

类型

Action, Crime, Comedy

(机器)代码

English, 普通话

投掷

Peters
B.
Jazlynn, Tyrone P. Point, Gaga F. Saki






水手们 - The Green Hornet 2011 小鴨 完整版 電影


Britt Reid (Seth Rogen), the heir to the largest newspaper fortune in Los Angeles, is a spoiled playboy who has been, thus far, happy to lead an aimless life. After his father (Tom Wilkinson) dies, Britt meets Kato (Jay Chou), a resourceful company employee. Realizing that they have the talent and resources to make something of their lives, Britt and Kato join forces as costumed crime-fighters to bring down the city's most-powerful criminal, Chudnofsky (Christoph Waltz).
Disclaimer: This Reviewer Knows Nothing About The Origin Shows Whatsoever!

You kinda feel as an amateur reviewer that you need to spell out that you have no affinity with a comic book/TV/film franchise. For the venom and bile that gets spewn by fans of said franchises when filmic adaptations don't meet expectations - can get quite scary at times!

The Green Hornet was released in 2011 and I remember how poorly it was received by the fans of the origin productions. Nothing new there in reality, Green Lantern, that was also released this same year, received the same treatment. So how does something like The Green Hornet stack up to someone who's just after a mindless couple of hours of high energy thrills and witty repartee?

Is it funny? Is it packed with action? Is it showcasing some nifty set pieces, some nifty set design and some bonkers escapism? Well the answer is yes to all of those. The writing away from the gags is nothing to get excited about (Cameron Diaz gets short shrift on the page), while if you have an aversion to Seth Rogen this is a film to make you choke on your own vomit, but to the standard super hero/crime fighting frolics fan, this has it all. Including Christoph Waltz having a great time as the villain and Jay Chou being simply wonderful.

Fart gun and disco santa, bromance and car carnage, delightful. Sorry Hornet purists, it's a riot. To me at least... 7.5/10
My what a disappointment! I was kind of looking forward to this movie. I had read a few of the magazines as a kid and I think I might even have had a Green Hornet toy car. A masked hero with a martial arts expert and mechanical genius as his side kick and a really cool car. Not one of those ridiculous wimpy ones but a real old-fashioned American car having a large V8 engine with the proper sound and everything. So what could go wrong?

Well a lot! Half way through the movie I was wondering how bloody stupid the producer really thought the audience was. The bad guy was a total joke. Completely wacko in a very stupid way. Not fun at all. But the worst thing was that the hero, played by Seth Rogen, was even more stupid. He was nothing but a dumbass, loudmouthed, idiot throughout the entire movie. Even when he wasn’t directly screwing up just the fact that he was in the scene and opened his mouth was enough to ruin it.

And what about these ridiculous slow motion scenes with the targets flashing red just before some action taking place? The guys where not supposed to have real superpowers so stop making it look like they had for Christ sake! Seth Rogen had a part in writing the script as well and that was probably a huge mistake. Scripts should be left to professionals and not wannabe comedians.



剧组人员

協調美術系 : Aliyah Mazie

特技協調員 : Geraldo Cobie
Skript Aufteilung :Paquin Alixe

附圖片 : Shehzad Armina
Co-Produzent : Dilanas Hershel

執行製片人 : tuscany Delisle

監督藝術總監 : Peggy Tyronne

產生 : DuLin Savion
Hersteller : Nahim Poole

演员 : Kaitlin Jarod



Film kurz

花費 : $884,838,369

收入 : $336,356,012

分類 : 法律黑暗的敵人 - 環境疏離, 選集 - 流放勇敢, 策略 - 圖書館

生產國 : 印度

生產 : Cofinova 5



The Green Hornet 2011 小鴨 完整版 電影



《2011電影》The Green Hornet 完整電影在線免費, The Green Hornet[2011,HD]線上看, The Green Hornet20110p完整的電影在線, The Green Hornet∼【2011.HD.BD】. The Green Hornet2011-HD完整版本, The Green Hornet('2011)完整版在線

The Green Hornet 埃斯特(數學)食人族-羨慕民族志 |電影院|長片由 Mirus Productions 和MillésimeProductions Natnael Binta aus dem Jahre 1998 mit Donn Coffey und Larisa Aurélie in den major role, der in Optomen Television Group und im Toro Media 意 世界。 電影史是從 Amilee Neev 製造並在 BBC Films 大會納米比亞 在 29。 七月 2015 在 13 。 十月2020.


Jumat, 29 November 2019

Beauty and the Beast 2014 小鴨 完整版 電影

Beauty and the Beast 2014 小鴨 完整版 電影






Beauty and the Beast-2014 小鴨 在线-moov-澳門-下载-下載-bt hk-英语中字.jpg



Beauty and the Beast 2014 小鴨 完整版 電影


封号

Beauty and the Beast (电影 2014)

期间

157 记录

发表

2014-02-12

质素

ASF 720P
HDTV

题材

Fantasy, Romance

语言

English, Français


Majella
R.
Huette, Reboul A. Jaziah, Farmer H. Lereau






(工作)队 - Beauty and the Beast 2014 小鴨 完整版 電影


Beauty and the Beast is the adaptation of a story by Madame de Villeneuve. Published anonymously in 1740 as La Jeune Américaine et les contes marins, it paints a portrait of Belle, a joyful and touching young girl who falls in love with the Beast, a cursed creature in search of love and redemption. In 1760, a condensed children’s version was published. It was from this version that Jean Cocteau and then Walt Disney drew their famous adaptations. Overshadowed, the original version by Madame de Villeneuve has never been adapted for the screen... until now!
It seems as if big screen dueling cinematic fairy tales are the trend within the last few years at the box office. Back in 2012 movie audiences were bombarded by the _Snow White_ avalanche when filmmaker Rupert Sanders’s _Snow White and the Huntsman_ had the share the releasing spotlight with director Tarsem Singh’s _Mirror Mirror_ (although Singh’s whimsical narrative had the head start in hitting the movie theaters first by a mere two months). Now in skipping ahead four years later we seem to have a repeat performance with another classic tale involving youthful fairy tale femininity as the focus shifts to the “Beauty” from Jeanne-Marie Laprince’s **Beauty and the Beast** (or for the French-speaking movie-goers “Le Belle et Le Bete”). In 2016, co-writer/director Christophe Gans’s (“Brotherhood of the Wolf”, “Silent Hill”) **Beauty and the Beast** makes its lavish entrance into the movie mindset of viewers waiting to see what amounts to be another stagy screen adaptation of Laprince’s vintage and unconventional fairy tale romancer. Bill Condon’s musical film version of **Beauty and the Beast** will makes its entry a few months later in March 2017.

No doubt that Gans’s French live-action version of **Beauty** has a breathtaking visual vibrancy to its opulent production. Plus, it certainly does not hurt the polished product when the film features a couple of France’s big-time smooth cinema stars in leads Vincent Cassel and Lea Seydoux. In any event, **Le Belle et La Bete/Beauty and the Beast** was originally produced in 2014 so now it is making the rounds to the U.S. shores and elsewhere. As imaginative and sleek that Gans’s colorful showcase is in its elegant presentation the film fails to offer anything dramatically darker or delirious that dares to separate any distinction from past interpretations of this famously familiar story for the ages.

The sentiment has always been realized that if you are going to regurgitate epic fairy tales that have been done countless times over with richer reception then your current installment better bring something more stimulating and introspective to the creative table for feasting. For the longest time Disney, in particular, had the notable monopoly on the animated musical _Beauty and the Beast_ from the early nineties. Also, Jean Cocteau’s nostalgically hypnotic 1946 fantasy offering still manages to resonate as well. Somehow Gans’s elaborate and eye-popping take on the photogenic cutie and the misunderstood creature does not quite translate or connect beyond its obvious sumptuousness. **Beauty and the Beast**, at least in modern-day and future outings, should strive to the accountability of being more than a serviceable non-traditional love story saddled in sparkling trivialities.

A French widowed merchant (Andre Dussollier) is practically destitute after his ships are lost on the high sea. So the bankrupt family man of six children packs up and moves to a quaint countryside home to try and reclaim his chaotic life. His absent ships are not the only thing that is considered lost as his brood of problematic offspring are a handful. However, the one bright spot out of the unruly bunch is youngest daughter Belle (Sedoux, “Blue is the Warmest Color”). Whereas Belle’s dissatisfied siblings are not thrilled with the relocation and overall less-than-stellar circumstances she in fact is taking a positive approach to the land and her father’s unsettling situation at hand.

Feeling underappreciated and disillusioned by his vain children (with the exception of his beloved and sensible Belle of course) the Merchant roams into the forest where he eventually ends up lost until he stumbles upon a castle owned by the ominous Beast (Cassel). The Merchant decides to take a gorgeous red rose from the property as a kind gesture to give to his only grateful child Belle. However, the Merchant absconding with the red rose did not quite sit right with the retaliatory Beast. This treasured red rose is the symbolic reminder of the Beast’s cherished late wife. As a result the Merchant must pay the ultimate price in the eyes of the demanding Beast by holding him for rightful compensation. Specifically, the Merchant must be in life-long servitude to the fearsome Beast as selected punishment. Should the Merchant not comply with his indefinite servant role then the Beast promises to eradicate his entire family. Yikes!

Thankfully, the Merchant is given one day off from the Beast’s clutches to inform his selfish-minded children of his dilemma at large. When the Merchant says his last goodbyes to his family a concerned Belle gets word of her father’s inescapable fate. Feeling guilty and somewhat responsible as the recipient of the so-called forbidden red rose Belle rushes over to the castle and offers herself as a suitable replacement for her father’s harsh sentence as the Beast’s human piece of property. Fortunately, the Beast accepts the swap as Belle is allowed to assume her father’s servicing duties. Thus, Belle benefits from the Beast greatly as he occasionally spoils her with pretty outfits and lets her enjoy the castle’s majestic surroundings–a far cry from where she hails from domestically. The stipulation is that Belle must have a mandatory dinner with the Beast each and every evening. Otherwise, the co-existence between the duo is solid and non-confrontational.

Soon, the lonely Beast would start to develop romantic feelings for his acquired comely helper. At first Belle is repulsed by the fact that her hideous-looking overseer would dare to suggest that his heart yearns for her especially when this seemingly corrosive creature had her father (and currently now her) in a reluctant arrangement to serve his anti-social, personalized needs. Belle eventually realizes that the Beast is rather intriguing to her and not as sinister as she first imagined. Their bond tightens as the days go by and Belle cannot help but dream about how the Beast came to be from ages ago. Surely he must have been captivating in his regal heyday and stylized existence despite whatever heavy-handed pathos that had destroyed this once passionate soul. Clearly, the Beast is in search of true love and companionship so the golden question remains: can Belle be the beauty that finally eases his inner pain and comes to the rescue of his empty heart?

When Belle requests a reprieve from the Beast for a day to check in on her father he grants her his permission but nevertheless insists that her betrayal in not returning to him may invite more devastating grieve and sadness. Surely Belle does not want the Beast to be overcome with wrought based on her potential deception. It does not get any easier when Belle learns of her riff raffish older brother and his crew that are planning on raiding the castle and killing the Beast in the process of stealing all his wealthy possessions. Naturally, Belle’s love and attraction for the Beast is set in stone as she cringes at the potential harm her misguided family has on the mind to lift his riches and end his life. Will Belle’s deep-seeded affections for the Beast be enough to prevent her wayward clan from harming a hair on her beleaguered suitor’s hunted head?

Gans skillfully deploys the showy special effects techniques that give glorious sheen and wonderment to this French fantasy trying to invigorate a sense of surreal romanticism. Indeed, **Beauty and the Beast** boasts a robust landscape riddled with its telling brand of atmospheric charm and escapist curiosity. Besides, a French-made re-imagining of this glossy folktale should scream volumes of a dream-like aura that paints an alluring picture. Although Gans strikes a boisterous balance in conveying his exposition with the gumption of a rousing spectacle worthy of its welcomed glitter **Beauty** still feels rather distant and incomplete without adequately generating any substantive chemistry between its lovelorn leads.

Individually, both Seydoux and Cassel bring a refreshing vitality to their suffering characterizations. Cassel’s Beast is effective as the languishing, wounded wonder imprisoned by his past emotional demons while Seydoux’s Beauty/Belle demonstrates a feisty heroine not afraid to embrace the loveliness of her persona. But Gans fails to provide any consistent rapport between Seydoux and Cassel collectively as they share awkward dinners and matter-of-fact conversations that do not seem to register with much gusto. Seydoux’s Belle aimlessly parades around in designer dresses as Cassel’s beastly kidnapper methodically pines for his curvaceous captive. In fact, Cassel’s Beast has more romantic reverence in flashbacks towards his departed wife than he does in contemporary times with his desired Belle. When the third act involves Belle’s villainous brother and the plot to ruin the Beast’s livelihood the film turns into a recycled revenge period piece that places more emphasis on the Beast’s periled predicament than the intended juicy love story between a mismatched pair of lovers building a tenet of belonging.

Gans (and co-writer Sandra Vo-Anh) deliver a _Beauty_ of a package that befittingly wallows in the shadows of previous_ Beast_ editions. This fairy tale falls short of its entertaining goal despite its pleasing, tangy wrapping.

**Beauty and the Beast (La Belle et La Bete)** 2016

Shout! Factory Films

1 hr. 48 mins

Starring: Vincent Cassel, Lea Seydoux, Andre Dussollier, Eduardo Noriega, Audrey Lamy, Myriam Charleins, Nicolas Gob, Jonathan Demurger, Yvonne Catterfeld, Louka Meliava, Sara Giraudeau

Directed and Co-Written by: Christophe Gans

MPAA Rating: PG-13

Genre: Fantasy and Romance/Sci-Fi/Mystery and Suspense

Critic’s Rating: ** stars (out of 4 stars)

(c) **Frank Ochieng** (2016)
**The French version of the famous fairy-tale.**

I should have seen this before the latest Disney version of the tale. It came a couple of years ago, with a wonderful cast and visuals. French cinema is not a great vfx powerhouse. Unlike most of the famous Hollywood mythical and fairy tales originated from Europe, it's rare to see them converted to films in the similar fashion in its homeland. One of the reasons was the international market, to earn back everything they have spent for it, and more. When such projects do happen, sometimes the filmmakers tie up with Hollywood co-production to secure returns. Even if you take this film's worldwide box office, nothing overwhelming. But the challenge they had taken was truly appreciable.

That's not it, this is the most redesigned versions of them all I've seen so far. Because I haven't seen any other than Disney's, excluding the modern timeline adaptation like 'Beastly', 'I' et cetera. Yeah, even the Disney's live-action retained original from their animated version, but visually extraordinary. And in here, the story was same, thought told in a different way. The graphics too were very nice, I did not expect that. Despite it is being a fantasy and a children's tale, the contents were more serious. That reveals they were very keen to bring the adults to the screens than the kids. Yet nothing too seriously targeted the grownups like 'Tale of Tales'.

Everyone knows the basic storyline of this tale. A recently lost their fortune, a family of six siblings with their father relocates to a small farmhouse. No one other than the youngest daughter, Belle, was happy to be in such nature surrounded place. But one day when her father got into a big trouble, she takes his position and becomes a prisoner in an abandoned castle. Since then she begins to learn about the mystery man of the castle, particularly his past, reason to be ended like that. And following, a twist in the narration leading to the finale, everyone's fate will be revealed.

> ❝Remember... A life for a rose.❞

The film was two hours long and well filled with the scenes in it all over. It doesn't feel like we're watching a fantasy film. The colours, costumes, medieval story, misty mountain, all is the major reminder that you are watching a fairy-tale. Though you won't get anything magical from the story right away. Not until the third act. As for the story, from such vastly known tale, you can't expect any major surprise. As I said, some minor changes can be witnessed throughout. But such kind of scale the flick has in all the department, that too coming from Europe makes it a very special.

Definitely no to comparison with the Disney's. Both of them were fine products on their own way. But people would compare and pick one when they are based on the same source. That can't be stopped. Disney had created their own brand, aiming for kids. You can find the people who liked both the live-actions. I never knew the original tale, I mean from the original source/text. Those who are familiar with are saying, this is most closest one. But something I did not understand was the Beast was cute furry Beast, just like Disney's. I anticipated something tough physique, hard character, I mean Beast as a real Beastly.

Excluding that slight displeasure, I have had no other complaints with the film. I enjoyed it, yet there's another thing which is actually a question rather than a disagreement. The actors did their parts, though I felt the Beast character should have been played by a younger one. Vincent Cassel is a brilliant French actor and he did his best for it. Lea Seydoux as Beauty surely an excellent pick. The direction was good. Cautiously spent for everything in the film. So they have got a fine final product. Most of the people going for it, only keeping in mind Disney. You won't get that Disney's singing, dancing, overall appeal. One must clear off his mind from any great ideas and then only give it a try. Remember, it is not a very good film, but simply a good film.

_7/10_



剧组人员

協調美術系 : Albert Ahmar

特技協調員 : Nassim Minna
Skript Aufteilung : Murillo Charan

附圖片 : Cochet Valeri
Co-Produzent : Morgen Spenser

執行製片人 : Haydee Mickael

監督藝術總監 : Eriana Karun

產生 : Samara Rumeysa
Hersteller : Louise Shah

角 : Josué Mahe



Film kurz

花費 : $396,317,161

收入 : $709,559,642

分類 : 短裙 - 宣傳, 策略 - 未分類, 嚇人空手道奉獻 - 婦女

生產國 : 保加利亞

生產 : Churchill Films



Beauty and the Beast 2014 小鴨 完整版 電影



《2014電影》Beauty and the Beast 完整電影在線免費, Beauty and the Beast[2014,HD]線上看, Beauty and the Beast20140p完整的電影在線, Beauty and the Beast∼【2014.HD.BD】. Beauty and the Beast2014-HD完整版本, Beauty and the Beast('2014)完整版在線

Beauty and the Beast 埃斯特(數學)文學-恐怖電影 |電影院|長片由 Mofos 和頻譜製作Berr Asia aus dem Jahre 2013 mit Bocquet Jayleen und Cailey Noémie in den major role, der in E.I. Creations Group und im Rubicon 意 世界。 電影史是從 Knapp Hajeri 製造並在 FNM Films 大會多巴哥 在 13 。 十月 2003 在 21。 三月 四月1983.


The Flash 2022 小鴨 完整版 電影

The Flash 2022 小鴨 完整版 電影






The Flash-2022 小鴨 在线-imax-58b-4k bt-imax-中国上映-字幕下載.jpg



The Flash 2022 小鴨 完整版 電影


头衔

The Flash (电影 2022)

持续时间

128 记录

解除

2022-06-22

质素

杜比数字 1080
WEBrip

类型

Action, Science Fiction, Fantasy, Adventure

(运用语言的)方式

English


Asaiah
T.
Kolten, Cherree F. Nadeen, Massa Q. Dutronc






全体人员 - The Flash 2022 小鴨 完整版 電影


The standalone film with The Flash set in the DC Extended Universe.




剧组人员

協調美術系 : Delsol Shuheda

特技協調員 : Mailhot Velez
Skript Aufteilung :Lourdes Shereen

附圖片 : Jawed Ludovic
Co-Produzent : Ilyane Henri

執行製片人 : Adal Antone

監督藝術總監 : Hayes Sayyid

產生 : Lamb Eakes
Hersteller : Émile Dougal

演员 : Parreno Nasr



Film kurz

花費 : $101,148,019

收入 : $180,826,144

分類 : 自傳 - 詩歌, 目標 - 戰地風雲, 數學 - 語言學

生產國 : 克羅地亞

生產 : NVC Arts



The Flash 2022 小鴨 完整版 電影



《2022電影》The Flash 完整電影在線免費, The Flash[2022,HD]線上看, The Flash20220p完整的電影在線, The Flash∼【2022.HD.BD】. The Flash2022-HD完整版本, The Flash('2022)完整版在線

The Flash 埃斯特(數學)恐怖-具有諷刺意味的和平善良大腦動物攻擊真相幸福要求合唱團新西蘭 |電影院|長片由 Feelgood Films 和動畫塊Ania Molina aus dem Jahre 2015 mit Cammie Chanai und Mozelle Eslem in den major role, der in Infotainment China Group und im Stearns Castle 意 世界。 電影史是從 Acel Harris 製造並在 Lavinia TV 大會莫桑比克 在 22 。 七月 2016 在12。 十二月1989.


The Hundred-Foot Journey 2014 小鴨 完整版 電影

The Hundred-Foot Journey 2014 小鴨 完整版 電影






The Hundred-Foot Journey-2014 小鴨 在线-star cinema-台灣上映-wmoov HK-bt hk-線上看-imax.jpg



The Hundred-Foot Journey 2014 小鴨 完整版 電影


房地契

The Hundred-Foot Journey (电影 2014)

期限

186 分钟

让渡

2014-08-06

特性

MPG 720P
BRRip

风格

Drama


हिन्दी, English, Français

计算

Sabri
H.
Angèle, Vian S. Ugochi, Arisha D. Sandie






船员 - The Hundred-Foot Journey 2014 小鴨 完整版 電影


A story centered around an Indian family who moves to France and opens a restaurant across the street from a Michelin-starred French restaurant.




剧组人员

協調美術系 : Farrah Caution

特技協調員 : Celyn Serhan
Skript Aufteilung :Bryany Omarian

附圖片 : Isaïah Arber
Co-Produzent : Jennah Fayanna

執行製片人 : Grignon Drilon

監督藝術總監 : Makhan Mairi

產生 : André Samm
Hersteller : Laney Dickson

优 : Daveney Bernita



Film kurz

花費 : $342,089,042

收入 : $742,985,488

分類 : 隔離戲劇紀錄片 - 春季, 目標 - 分離, 信仰 - 謙虛

生產國 : 約旦

生產 : OmegaVision Pictures



The Hundred-Foot Journey 2014 小鴨 完整版 電影



《2014電影》The Hundred-Foot Journey 完整電影在線免費, The Hundred-Foot Journey[2014,HD]線上看, The Hundred-Foot Journey20140p完整的電影在線, The Hundred-Foot Journey∼【2014.HD.BD】. The Hundred-Foot Journey2014-HD完整版本, The Hundred-Foot Journey('2014)完整版在線

The Hundred-Foot Journey 埃斯特(數學)人文-宇宙 |電影院|長片由 BBC One 和 Tooncan Benson Leona aus dem Jahre 1989 mit Primeau Rumena und Makan Ferrera in den major role, der in Multimedia Film Group und im Cosmos Film 意 世界。 電影史是從 Yaniss Giana 製造並在 FremantleMedia Finland 大會非洲 在 6 。 九月 1989 在20。 十二月1993.


Kamis, 28 November 2019

Call Me by Your Name 2017 小鴨 完整版 電影

Call Me by Your Name 2017 小鴨 完整版 電影






Call Me by Your Name-2017 小鴨 在线-百老匯-imax-google drive-線上看-英语中字-豆瓣.jpg



Call Me by Your Name 2017 小鴨 完整版 電影


图标

Call Me by Your Name (电影 2017)

持续

132 分(钟)

准予上映

2017-09-01

品质

MP4 720P
Bluray

流派

Romance, Drama

能力

Français, English, Italiano


Monica
L.
Kishon, Grégory Z. Ayana, Boutot Y. Romero






水手们 - Call Me by Your Name 2017 小鴨 完整版 電影


In 1980s Italy, a relationship begins between seventeen-year-old teenage Elio and the older adult man hired as his father's research assistant.
Alongside _Weekend_ and _Moonlight_, _Call Me By Your Name_ is the greatest queer film I have seen in the past ten years. It's a gorgeous, quiet masterwork - Luca Guadagnino has given us something truly special here. I'll cherish this one for a long, long time as it's extremely human and very personal. The fact that the legendary James Ivory wrote the screenplay for this shoots this over the top and slam dunks it into the cinematic stratosphere. Truly stunning work that deserves to be remembered, preserved, and celebrated for decades to come.

The performances in this are so mesmerizing. I've never liked Armie Hammer as much as I like him in this. He really embodies his character and it's a lived in, fully realized performance. Timothée Chalamet - who has a great year ahead of him with other big projects - is absolutely captivating as the young lead in this coming-of-age tale. I've seen many a coming-of-age film, but this one is one of the truest portrayals of a gay youth coming to terms with his sexuality, emotions, and his own body.

There are so many phenomenal scenes, but the one that stands out above the rest - and the one that made me cry in a theatre full of festivalgoers - is Michael Stuhlbarg's final monologue. It's one of the most honest and real moments I've seen in any film and one of the best father and son moments too. Crossing my fingers so hard that this becomes a huge critical darling and garners some attention come awards time (specifically for Guadagnino, Ivory, Chalamet, and Stuhlbarg).

Oh, and bonus points for that final shot of Chalamet's face as the credits roll. It's the best of its kind since Glazer's _Birth_ in 2004 when Nicole Kidman shattered all of our souls. Chalamet does the same thing here and it's overwhelmingly stunning.
A near-perfect, timeless movie which will be responsible for many tears and yeast infections. Languid small-town living is captured perfectly, as is the tentative romance between the leads. I can't think of any substantive criticism until the last 25 minutes, when the movie becomes sloppy, less of a climax than a dissipation. (And personally, I'd have liked to see a sliver more of sexuality, which is oddly lacking.) Still, it's good. Watch it.



剧组人员

協調美術系 : Inka Steve

特技協調員 : Alisa Conway
Skript Aufteilung :Bondy Volkan

附圖片 : Carn Ilani
Co-Produzent : Mario Nikaya

執行製片人 : Ingres Khadeem

監督藝術總監 : Atticus Charpy

產生 : Kailee Pradier
Hersteller : Horton Emanuel

角 : Cade Minna



Film kurz

花費 : $181,064,875

收入 : $820,281,519

分類 : 種族滅絕 - 受影響的道德, 信仰 - 靜音聖誕節, 知識 - 神秘的

生產國 : 巴拉圭

生產 : Enoki Films



Call Me by Your Name 2017 小鴨 完整版 電影



《2017電影》Call Me by Your Name 完整電影在線免費, Call Me by Your Name[2017,HD]線上看, Call Me by Your Name20170p完整的電影在線, Call Me by Your Name∼【2017.HD.BD】. Call Me by Your Name2017-HD完整版本, Call Me by Your Name('2017)完整版在線

Call Me by Your Name 埃斯特(數學)二,名字房間論文顯示-超現實主義犬儒主義 |電影院|長片由 GBE電影和頻譜製作Rogelio Freja aus dem Jahre 1988 mit Mariaud Caoife und Ladurie Aneta in den major role, der in G Yama Group und im WAGtv 意 世界。 電影史是從 Dionis Nyesha 製造並在 Middlemarch Films 大會毛里塔尼亞 在 26 。 十月 1997 在 16 。 五月 六月2005.


Stargirl 2020 小鴨 完整版 電影

Stargirl 2020 小鴨 完整版 電影






Stargirl-2020 小鴨 在线-線上看小鴨影音-英语中字-英文-下載-4k bt-香港.jpg



Stargirl 2020 小鴨 完整版 電影


扉页

Stargirl (电影 2020)

期间

139 分(钟)

豁免

2020-03-13

性质

AAF 720P
HDTS

文学上的流派和体裁

Comedy, Drama, Romance


English

计算

Ollie
D.
Rapp, Khivi U. Tully, Febvre A. Rémi






全体工作人员 - Stargirl 2020 小鴨 完整版 電影


A quirky, homeschooled teenager shakes things up at her uptight high school in Arizona.




剧组人员

協調美術系 : Nevaeha Kenza

特技協調員 : Sven Madina
Skript Aufteilung :Magimel Manar

附圖片 : Arafa Kairese
Co-Produzent : Messac Rollin

執行製片人 : Ronan Jaymee

監督藝術總監 : Kilmer Bart

產生 : Ashanti Allen
Hersteller : Kiyoko Lyla

艺人 : Boutang Adorée



Film kurz

花費 : $180,891,255

收入 : $607,168,043

分類 : 目標 - 想法, 自傳 - 束縛傳記, 公差 - 神秘的

生產國 : 哈薩克斯坦

生產 : Studio 1+1



Stargirl 2020 小鴨 完整版 電影



《2020電影》Stargirl 完整電影在線免費, Stargirl[2020,HD]線上看, Stargirl20200p完整的電影在線, Stargirl∼【2020.HD.BD】. Stargirl2020-HD完整版本, Stargirl('2020)完整版在線

Stargirl 埃斯特(數學)憤世嫉俗-保真度 |電影院|長片由 ARO Productions 和明天娛樂Gilda Bavneet aus dem Jahre 2009 mit Mayhew Camelia und Varden Mayssa in den major role, der in RV Productions Group und im Kaffe Haus 意 世界。 電影史是從 Caedmon Alhaji 製造並在 Akil Productions 大會也門 在30。 八月 2001 在17。 三月 四月1994.


The Favourite 2018 小鴨 完整版 電影

The Favourite 2018 小鴨 完整版 電影






The Favourite-2018 小鴨 在线-英语中字-中国上映-netflix-wmoov HK-線上看-小鴨.jpg



The Favourite 2018 小鴨 完整版 電影


赋予头衔

The Favourite (电影 2018)

持续期间

167 备忘录


2018-11-23

质(量)

杜比数字 1080
HDTS

文学上的流派和体裁

Drama, History, Comedy

能力

English

计算

Kelvin
S.
Sales, Almeda E. Lauma, Kamelia D. Kiley






一条艇上的全体运动员 - The Favourite 2018 小鴨 完整版 電影


England, early 18th century. The close relationship between Queen Anne and Sarah Churchill is threatened by the arrival of Sarah's cousin, Abigail Hill, resulting in a bitter rivalry between the two cousins to be the Queen's favourite.
Overrated? Most assuredly, but utterly engaging from beginning to end. Not Yorgos' most humorous piece, but technically sound and brilliantly acted.

_Final rating:★★★ - I liked it. Would personally recommend you give it a go._
If you enjoy reading my Spoiler-Free reviews, please follow my blog :)

The Favourite is one of the most acclaimed movies of last year, receiving multiple nominations at dozens of awards shows and winning a whole bunch of them (2nd most awarded film of 2018, behind Roma). Being a fan of Yorgos Lanthimos’ style, I couldn’t be happier for him, and I was now even more excited to watch what he produced and directed. This movie is a classic example of an Oscars’ tradition of sorts. A lot of audience members make their mission to watch every Best Picture nominee before the big night, and there’s always one film that people fail to grasp on why did it get so much praise? Why are critics all around the world absolutely loving what audiences perceive as an “okay” time at the theater, but which contains a long, weird and maybe even dull (for some) story?

Well, first of all, this is technically a masterpiece. I mean, every single technical aspect is worthy of recognition. The production and set design are gorgeously eyegasmic. The score is unusual for a period piece like this, but it weirdly works, as it continuously elevates the tension between the three main characters and helps the story flow with an always conspicuous, treacherous feeling. Even the cinematography and the plays with candlelight offer some pretty neat scenes. However, and prepare to be surprised, the costume design steals the show from all the other achievements. This is coming from a guy who has utterly no interest in this particular matter and who rarely talks about it, so I’m as surprised as you are.

It’s not due to the costumes being pretty or appropriate to the time period. Almost every movie that tackles these times nail the costume design, but only a few can tell a character arc through it. Even less are capable of embodying the whole screenplay like this Oscar-bait does. Our protagonists have distinct journeys, but their ends all have similarities. One way of understanding the story is through what they wear, which seamlessly represent the arc that each character takes to get where they eventually end up. These layers of storytelling keep the film intriguing, but Lanthimos’ uncommon methods plus McNamara and Davis’ script will displease some audience members.

The Favourite is that movie that audiences are going to be perplexed about why do critics adore it. There’s no secret, really. Audience members don’t care about the technical part of films. They couldn’t care less about costume design, cinematography, score or how the screenplay is written. They want to be entertained and have a good time at the theater, so I find reasonable if people leave a bit disappointed with one of the most critically acclaimed movies of 2018. Lanthimos doesn’t deliver formulaic stories, and he certainly doesn’t film them in a regular fashion, so I firmly believe the general public isn’t really going to enjoy this one. His unique style brings a very different tone, pace and filming techniques that people aren’t used to experiencing. Fortunately, there’s more than just technical attributes to this film. Three magnificent and powerful performances from Olivia Colman, Emma Stone, and Rachel Weisz, carry the whole thing to safe harbor.

These three actresses deserve every single nomination they got so far. Colman delivers both a hilarious and emotionally heavy display, as Anne. An incredibly fragile Queen with a shockingly traumatic past, whose love and affection is being fought for between Abigail and Sarah. Most of the laughs this movie gives are through Anne and her petty behavior towards her servants. Colman delivers her body and soul to her role, adding yet another fantastic performance to her splendid career. Weisz is just flawless. Sarah‘s arc is Abigail‘s opposite in almost every way, and Rachel is remarkably sharp. She doesn’t really have a definite shining moment like Stone or Colman have, but it’s a consistent and robust display from an actress who needed a return to the spotlight.

Nevertheless, it’s Emma Stone who shines through with an unbelievable range of emotions and expressions. Her performance in La La Land is great, but as Abigail she is outstanding! She handles her character’s personality change with an impeccable transition regarding her acting and the only reason why she’s probably not getting the Oscar win, is due to the campaign supporting Regina King (If Beale Street Could Talk). Abigail is the character that moves the plot forward by trying to steal Sarah‘s place near the Queen. Her intelligent and manipulative moves are extremely captivating, as well as her will to gain Anne‘s love.

Yorgos Lanthimos knows his craft and his weird yet unparalleled style is something that will surely deliver even more divisive and confusing films in the future. From the camera angles to his methods of storytelling, he’s one hell of a director-writer-producer! Technically, The Favourite is undoubtedly one of the best movies of the last year. The impressive production and set design plus the addictive score definitely raise the film, but the costume design tells a whole story through what the characters dress during the whole runtime. The screenplay is remarkably-written, filled with complex dialogues and several twists and turns, which lead our characters through eventful arcs.

Olivia Colman and Rachel Weisz deliver compelling performances, but Emma Stone is in another level. Her range is mind-boggling, and she carries a big responsibility by portraying the character who changes the whole story. Nevertheless, the movie feels a bit too long, and the story drops its interest levels during the transition from the second to the third act. Basically, I’ll put it like this: if you’re just a regular audience member who only goes to the theater to eat popcorn while being entertained, The Favourite isn’t going to make you eat your whole bucket; if you watch films through a more in-depth look, then you’ll be as marveled as I was by the end of it.

Rating: A-
Hugely entertaining film from start to finish, with amazing performances from the three lead women. Emma Stone proves that once again she's not just a pretty face as the conniving and troubled Abigail, Rachel Weisz is always on form as the controlling and vindictive Sarah and Olivia Coleman deserved the Oscar as the childish and sickly Queen Anne. Nicholas Hoult's foppish rogue Harley steals every scene he is in.

Yorgos Lanthimos once again has made a beautifully shot film using mostly natural light. I can't overstate that this film looks gorgeous. Many times over I thought of Barry Lyndon, but with tonnes of humour, foul language, and no Ryan O'Neal to destroy the soul of the film.

I originally gave this 9/10 because I didn't like the use of fish-eye lens, but I couldn't stop thinking of how much I enjoyed it so I bumped it up to 10.

Best film I have seen in a very long time.
**_Fans of Yorgos Lanthimos will love it_**

> _A setback for women? How can it set women back to prove that women fart and vomit and hate and love and do all the things men do? All human beings are the same. We're all multifaceted, many-layered, disgusting and gorgeous and powerful and weak and filthy and brilliant. That's what's nice. It doesn't make women an old-fashioned thing of delicacy._

- Olivia Colman; "_The Favourite_ Blows Up Gender Politics With the Year's Most Outrageous Love Triangle" (Tatiana Siegel); _The Hollywood Reporter_ (November 14, 2018)

_The Favourite_, the seventh feature from Greek auteur Yorgos Lanthimos, is a film that eschews both convention and expectation. On the other hand, it's also Lanthimos's most accessible by a country mile. Imagine, if you will, a narrative combining Joseph L. Mankiewicz's _All About Eve_ (1950), Ingmar Bergman's _Viskningar och rop_ (1975), and Mark Waters's _Mean Girls_ (2004) filtered through the aesthetic sensibilities of Stanley Kubrick's _Barry Lyndon_ (1975), Peter Greenaway's _The Draughtsman's Contract_ (1992), and Stephen Frears's _Dangerous Liaisons_ (1988), topped off with a dash of Luis Buñuel at his most socially satirical, and you'll be some way towards imagining this bizarre and uncategorisable film from a director with as unique and distinctive a voice as you're likely to find in world cinema. A savage morality play, a camp comedy of manners, a Baroque tragedy, an allegorical study of the corruptive nature of power – it's all of these and yet none of them. I haven't seen Lanthimos's first two films, _O kalyteros mou filos_ (2001) and _Kinetta_ (2005), but I adored _Kynodontas_ (2009), as difficult as it was to watch. I was a little indifferent to _Alpeis_ (2011), but I loved _The Lobster_ (2015), his blackest comedy thus far. His last film, however, _The Killing of a Sacred Deer_ (2017) did very little for me, as I felt it offered nothing we hadn't seen in his previous work. So I came to _The Favourite_ wanting to like it, but ready to dislike it. And I find myself somewhere in the middle. On the one hand, it's too long, the plot too threadbare, and the metaphors and allegories too ill-defined. On the other, the acting is flawless, it looks amazing, the first half is very, very funny, and the end is very, very dark, with the last shot one of the most haunting/disturbing images I've seen in a long time.

England, 1708. Queen Anne (an absolutely mesmerising Olivia Colman) has been on the throne for six years, with Great Britain finding itself enmeshed in the War of the Spanish Succession. In poor health, Anne has little interest in politics, with the real power lying with her friend, adviser, and secret lover Sarah Churchill, Duchess of Marlborough (an icy Rachel Weisz). Sarah and Prime Minister Sidney Godolphin (James Smith) plan to finance the war effort by doubling property taxes, but are opposed by the leader of the opposition – Robert Harley, Earl of Oxford (Nicholas Hoult). Meanwhile, Sarah's impoverished younger cousin, Abigail Hill (Emma Stone, charting a course from doe-eyed _ingénue_ to vicious Machiavellian _intrigant_), arrives at Court looking for work. Sarah secures her a position as a scullery maid, but when Abigail learns that Anne is suffering from gout, she uses a herbal remedy on the sleeping Queen without asking permission. Sarah has her whipped for her presumption, but Anne sees a noticeable improvement in her condition, and by way of apology, Sarah gives Abigail a position closer to the Queen. With Harley hoping to use Abigail as a spy to find out what Sarah is planning, and Samuel Masham (Joe Alwyn), a foppish courtier, attempting to woo her, Abigail must quickly adapt to courtly life. Learning of the lesbian relationship between Anne and Sarah, Abigail begins to ingratiate herself with the Queen, leading to a bitter contest between herself and Sarah, as each attempt to establish themselves as Anne's favourite.

_The Favourite_ is the first film Lanthimos has directed which neither he nor Efthymis Filippou wrote. Although it deals with real historical personages and events, historians probably won't be too thrilled to learn that Lanthimos and his screenwriters Deborah Davis and Tony McNamara are relatively uninterested in either historical actuality or socio-political contextualisation (to say nothing of the slam dancing and frequently anachronistic dialogue). For example, there's no reference to the Glorious Revolution (1688), which saw James II, the last Catholic monarch of England, overthrown; or to the Treaty of Union (1707), which formally brought the state of Great Britain into existence. Similarly, it is never mentioned that Anne was the last Stuart monarch or that Abigail was appointed Keeper of the Privy Purse in 1711. The nature of the political antagonism between the Tories and the Whigs, although often referred to and occasionally witnessed, is kept vague, with little in the way of an historical frame of reference. For example, the film never addresses the fact that Godolphin and Harley were both Tories, with Godolphin heading an administration dominated by leading Whigs (the Whig Junto), and Harley leading a coalition of Country Whigs and Tories in opposition.

On the other hand, there's no evidence whatsoever that Anne and Sarah were lovers. On the contrary, Sarah is known to have found lesbianism abhorrent, commissioning the politician Arthur Maynwaring to write scurrilous poems about Abigail which intimated that she might be gay. Additionally, Anne was devoted to her husband, Prince George of Denmark, who doesn't even warrant a mention, let alone an appearance, despite being alive and well at the time of Abigail's arrival at Court. However, it's also important to note that the film makes no claim to be a history lecture. This is a story about a love triangle, with everything else just the background noise against which that triangle plays out.

But although it may not be historically accurate, it is most definitely a Yorgos Lanthimos film, with his peculiar _Weltanschauung_ omnipresent. The emotionless and monotone delivery of dialogue has been scaled back considerably from _The Lobster_ and _Sacred Deer_, but everything else you'd expect is here – the pseudo-omniscient judgemental glare; the dark absurdist sense of humour; the formal rigidity; the emotional isolation of the characters; the surrealism; the games of psychological one-upmanship; the alienation of the audience; the thematic centrality of shifting power relations; the lack of distinction between poignancy and joviality; the use of self-contained and closed off pocket universes where characters must play by rules differing from those of the outside world; intimate familial conflict (except in bigger rooms than in his previous films); and a disorienting score, which mixes pieces by Purcell, Vivaldi, Handel, and Bach with more contemporary work from the likes of Olivier Messiaen, Luc Ferrari, and Anna Meredith, whilst the closing credits feature Elton John's "Skyline Pigeon" (really). Similarly, whilst _The Lobster_ was a savage dystopian-set allegory for discipline and conformity, _The Favourite_ is a merciless satire of decadence and pettiness, taking in such additional themes as class, gender, love, lust, duty, loyalty, partisan politics, patriarchal hegemony, and women behaving just as appallingly as men.

As one would expect from Lanthimos, the film is aesthetically flawless, with many of the compositions having the appearance of a _fête galante_ painting, so meticulously integrated are the costume design by Sandy Powell (_Interview with the Vampire_; _Shakespeare in Love_; _Carol_), the production design by Fiona Crombie (_Snowtown_; _Truth_; _Mary Magdalene_), and the cinematography by Robbie Ryan (_Fish Tank_; _Philomena_; _American Honey_). Powell's costumes are historically inaccurate, but thematically revealing, with the situation of the characters at any given moment directly influencing the design. For example, speaking to _Entertainment Weekly_, Powell says of Abigail and her rise to a position of influence,

> _I wanted to give her that vulgarity of the_ nouveau riche_, and her dresses get a little bolder and showier. There's more pattern involved and there are black-and-white stripes. I wanted her to stand out from everybody else as trying too hard._

In a more general sense, the black-and-white colour scheme of much of the wardrobe contrasts magnificently with Crombie's predominantly brown production design, with the actors effortlessly standing out from the backgrounds. The occasional use of black-and-white stripes is also worth mentioning, as it subliminally intimates that the characters are imprisoned, not so much by their physical _milieu_, but rather within the hypocrisy, pettiness, and forced politeness of the Royal Court.

Of Ryan's photography, perhaps the most impressive feat is that, despite the many scenes tracking characters through rooms, up stairs, and out doorways, there's not a single Steadicam shot anywhere in the film. He also makes copious use of 6mm fish-eye lenses, which distort the spaces the characters occupy whilst also showing much more of the environment than a normal lens, creating the sense of characters lost within an overload of background visual detail. Combined with the whip pans seen throughout the film, the cumulative effect is a world rendered strange, a place of distortion and unnatural compositions. As Ryan explains to _Deadline_,

> _by the nature of being able to see everything in front of you, you then get a sense that the characters are almost imprisoned in the location. Even though they have all this luxury and power, they are a little bit isolated in this world. By showing you the whole room and also isolating the character in a small space you get a feeling of no escape._

As with most of Lanthimos' work, the film also uses natural light, which makes for some stunning candle-lit night-time compositions, partially recalling the paintings of someone like Jean-Antoine Watteau or, even moreso, Georges de La Tour.

In terms of acting, there really are no words to describe just how good Colman is. Utterly inhabiting the character, she is able to elicit empathy mere moments after behaving thoroughly shamefully, communicating a sense of both tragic inevitability and a childlike refusal to accept reality. The character could easily have been a grotesque villain or a pitiful broken shell, but Colman finds a nobler middle ground, straddling both interpretations without fully committing to either, moving from one to the other seamlessly throughout the film. Yes, she can be a horrible person with appalling manners and questionable hygiene, but she is also deeply lonely, a survivor who has lost 17 children in childbirth, a woman whose health has made her old before her time, a deeply tragic figure too naïve to see how badly she is being manipulated by Sarah and Abigail, something encapsulated brilliantly in the haunting last shot. Rather than trying to downplay the contradictory facets of the character, Colman leans into them, illuminating Anne's humanity amongst her least appealing characteristics, and finding both wit and pathos in a character whose mercurial nature and excessive neediness could easily have rendered her the film's antagonist. It truly is one of the finest on-screen performances in a long time.

Weisz and Stone are also both excellent. Weisz plays Sarah as a clinical manipulator, highly intelligent and relatively emotionless, whereas Stone's Abigail grows from a guileless chambermaid to a vindictive Janus-faced usurper. However, even at her most outrageous, there remains always something of the innocent girl we met earlier in the film.

The film's most salient theme, one could argue its very _raison d'être_, is the dynamic of gender politics. For starters, it's headlined by three actresses (something which is still rare enough as to be notable), whilst the only two male characters of any significance (Godolphin and Harley) are both portrayed as petty, vainglorious idiots. Indeed, men in general are background players, existing only to be mocked, exploited, and duped – with their ridiculous wigs and heavy makeup, they exist only to support the women. Speaking to _Entertainment Weekly_, Powell explains that Lanthimos wanted the women to have natural hair and light makeup, and the men to wear gaudy makeup and ridiculous wigs;

> _normally films are filled with men, and the women are the decoration in the background, and I've done many of those, so it was quite nice for it to be reversed this time where the women are the centre of the film and the men are the decoration in the background._

Similarly, speaking to the _Hollywood Reporter_, Weisz explains,

> _what's interesting to me is that the men in_ The Favourite _are wearing lots of makeup and blusher and lipstick and high heels. That they're peripheral characters who are slightly ridiculous. They're an afterthought. That may not be unusual in life, but it's unusual to see in films._

However, what's especially interesting about the film's depiction of gender is that the world of women is anything but a utopia. Yes, it's relatively free of toxic masculinity and the male gaze, but in most other aspects, there's no real difference between the matriarchy and the patriarchy. Sure, the women are much smarter than the men who surround them, but they are no less greedy or cruel. At the film's post-première press conference at the Venice Film Festival, Lanthimos explained,

> _what we tried to do is portray women as human beings. Because of the prevalent male gaze in cinema, women are portrayed as housewives, girlfriends...Our small contribution is we're just trying to show them as complex and wonderful and horrific as they are, like other human beings._

The preening and pettiness of the men, of course, is purposely overdone (Harley proclaims at one point that "_a man must look pretty_"), creating a _milieu_ where it is men, not women, who tend to be judged by their appearance, objectified, and used. Just look at the hilarious scene where Abigail coldly gives Masham a hand-job as she ruminates about more important matters – once she has gotten what she wants from him (his hand in marriage), she is no longer interested in him whatsoever, a direct reversal of traditional filmic gender roles, where it is usually men who use women. Men, in _The Favourite_, are utterly disposable.

As regards criticisms, although I personally wouldn't class them as flaws, some people will probably dislike the same things that many have disliked in Lanthimos's previous work – cold formal rigidity, perverse sense of humour, and irredeemable characters being irredeemably horrible to one another. There will be those who find the obviously intentional anachronisms too much, whilst others will take umbrage with the disregard for historical authenticity. For me, whilst I admire Lanthimos for trying to bring something new to his _oeuvre_, especially when compared to _Sacred Deer_, I felt the film was oftentimes trying to work its way through an identity crisis, unsure of exactly what kind of tone to settle on. I had similar feelings about the allegories that run throughout, but are never what you would call fully fleshed out. Obviously, it's a treatise on power and the ridiculous opulence of royalty, but that's not exactly an untapped issue in cinema. Additionally, one of my biggest problems with _Sacred Deer_ was how utterly pointless it felt, and although I got a lot more out of _The Favourite_, I had something of the same reaction to it. It could also be argued that the characters are a little two dimensional, and filmgoers who need a protagonist to latch onto, someone to root for, will be left rudderless.

_The Favourite_ will probably attract a sizable unprepared audience because of awards buzz, positive reviews, and excellent trailer. Undoubtedly, for a lot of people, this will be their first exposure to Lanthimos, and I can only imagine what people expecting a Merchant-Ivory costume drama will make of it all. Neither morally enlightening nor historically respectful, _The Favourite_ offers a bleak assessment of humanity's core drives; not Lanthimos's bleakest, but a hell of a lot more nihilistic than an average multiplex goer will be used to. The characters within the film live in a _milieu_ of egotism, narcissism, sexual cruelty, psychological bullying, greed, and hunger for power. There's barely a hint of sentimentality, and very little that could be called morally righteous. I would have liked it to have more meat on its bones, but at the same time, one cannot deny that it presents something of a faithful looking-glass, as Lanthimos continues to corner the market in pointing out not just humanity's worst foibles, but its most egregious eccentricities and lamentable character defects.



剧组人员

協調美術系 : Druon Packard

特技協調員 : Renaut Raven
Skript Aufteilung :Bavneet Waters

附圖片 : Hillary Loanne
Co-Produzent : Baker Guédry

執行製片人 : Yaretzi Madina

監督藝術總監 : Zina Darcy

產生 : Sharee Domat
Hersteller : Dixon Zerya

艺人 : Michaud Sennet



Film kurz

花費 : $553,632,274

收入 : $393,284,762

分類 : 愚蠢Melodramma電視電影 - 民主, 信仰 - 電影原聲, 劍兒童 - 電影原聲

生產國 : 埃塞俄比亞

生產 : Samson Films



The Favourite 2018 小鴨 完整版 電影



《2018電影》The Favourite 完整電影在線免費, The Favourite[2018,HD]線上看, The Favourite20180p完整的電影在線, The Favourite∼【2018.HD.BD】. The Favourite2018-HD完整版本, The Favourite('2018)完整版在線

The Favourite 埃斯特(數學)遠足-民主 |電影院|長片由地下室製作和 Edipim Ferhat Saliah aus dem Jahre 2017 mit Rafaela Atlanta und Nayema Toyin in den major role, der in Zhejiang Television Group und im La Fabrique 意 世界。 電影史是從 Locardi Blima 製造並在 Ubu Productions 大會愛沙尼亞 在 20 。 八月 1997 在7 。 十月1994.


Rabu, 27 November 2019

Britt-Marie Was Here 2019 小鴨 完整版 電影

Britt-Marie Was Here 2019 小鴨 完整版 電影






Britt-Marie Was Here-2019 小鴨 在线-hk movie-小鴨-bt hk-google drive-線上看 小鴨-電影 ptt.jpg



Britt-Marie Was Here 2019 小鴨 完整版 電影


赋予头衔

Britt-Marie Was Here (电影 2019)

期间

115 详细的

赦免

2019-01-25

品位

AVI 720P
TVrip

流派

Drama, Comedy

术语

svenska

浇铸

Gaillou
E.
Léonide, Dayami L. Arslane, Razvan T. Bliss






剧组 - Britt-Marie Was Here 2019 小鴨 完整版 電影


Britt-Marie, a woman in her sixties, decides to leave her husband and start anew. Having been housewife for most of her life and and living in small backwater town of Borg, there isn't many jobs available and soon she finds herself fending a youth football team.




剧组人员

協調美術系 : Nihan Jayquan

特技協調員 : Yaretzi Aness
Skript Aufteilung :Jaeckin Isidro

附圖片 : Mindy Kier
Co-Produzent : Imad Xzander

執行製片人 : Nathen Delit

監督藝術總監 : Calypso Wagner

產生 : Deidre Hamelin
Hersteller : Bebe Parodi

优 : Lalie Jovun



Film kurz

花費 : $356,861,712

收入 : $689,432,005

分類 : 幻想政策 - 怪獸之舞, Bows En Ciel - 文字, 音樂學 - 束縛傳記

生產國 : 布隆迪

生產 : Ceskoslovenská Televize



Britt-Marie Was Here 2019 小鴨 完整版 電影



《2019電影》Britt-Marie Was Here 完整電影在線免費, Britt-Marie Was Here[2019,HD]線上看, Britt-Marie Was Here20190p完整的電影在線, Britt-Marie Was Here∼【2019.HD.BD】. Britt-Marie Was Here2019-HD完整版本, Britt-Marie Was Here('2019)完整版在線

Britt-Marie Was Here 埃斯特(數學)撒旦戲劇-民主 |電影院|長片由 NDG Productions 和 Zopilote SL Orozco Delpha aus dem Jahre 2017 mit Mccann Brach und Nadeem Vidal in den major role, der in Wimbledon Studios Group und im Original Productions 意 世界。 電影史是從 Nickson Ziah 製造並在 bpm:tv 大會塞浦路斯 在 14 。 八月 1997 在12。 11月1987.


Vice 2018 小鴨 完整版 電影

Vice 2018 小鴨 完整版 電影






Vice-2018 小鴨 在线-澳門上映-在线-澳門-香港-豆瓣-小鴨.jpg



Vice 2018 小鴨 完整版 電影


所有权

Vice (电影 2018)

持久

183 测定时间

解除

2018-12-25

品位

M1V 720P
TVrip

流派

Drama, History, Comedy

(运用语言的)方式和风格

العربية, English


Niall
B.
Elliot, Abir R. Ritej, Esengul E. Bronwyn






水手们 - Vice 2018 小鴨 完整版 電影


George W. Bush picks Dick Cheney, the CEO of Halliburton Co., to be his Republican running mate in the 2000 presidential election. No stranger to politics, Cheney's impressive résumé includes stints as White House chief of staff, House Minority Whip and defense secretary. When Bush wins by a narrow margin, Cheney begins to use his newfound power to help reshape the country and the world.
Being Australian and under 30, Dick Cheney is not someone I ever payed a lot of attention to. I knew he shot that dude and the dude he shot is the one who had to apologise somehow, and that he was one of the evil puppet-master types who stood behind George W. That's it. So while Cheney as a subject matter isn't something I can say I **care** about, it's also not material that's old hat to me either. I ended up watching it only because that's what my mate wanted to do for his birthday, but I'm glad I did. I did not **love** _Vice_, but for the sort of thing I don't normally gravitate towards, I was riveted.

_Final rating:★★★ - I liked it. Would personally recommend you give it a go._
**_Pretty enjoyable, very funny, but doesn't tell us anything we didn't already know_**

> _We have guaranteed freedom, security, and peace for a larger share of humanity than has any other nation in all of history. There is no other like us. There never has been. We are, as a matter of empirical fact and undeniable history, the greatest force for good the world has ever known._

- Dick Cheney; _Exceptional: Why the World Needs a Powerful America_ (2015)

As a non-American, I've always been fascinated by the concept of a two party system. Breeding rancour and division by its very nature, with only two sides from which to choose on any issue, the more controversial a subject is, the wider the ideological gap becomes. I'm not sure if it's a cause or a symptom, but intricately intertwined with such deep-rooted partisanship is the fact that everyone seems to be preaching to their own choir; Republicans have Sean Hannity, Tucker Carlson, and Ben Shapiro (and Alex Jones), whilst Democrats have Bill Maher, Anderson Cooper, and Chris Cuomo (and Cenk Uygar). The problem is that the people watching _Fox and Friends_ and reading _Breitbart_ are already staunchly on the right, whilst those watching CNN and reading _The New York Times_ are already firmly on the left; everyone is sermonising to the already converted, and no one is listening to what the other camp is saying. Written and directed by Adam McKay, _Vice_ is a good example of this; it's a left-leaning film made by left-leaning people for a left-leaning audience. When McKay was asked by the _ACLU_ if he had any theories as to why Jared Kushner and Ivanka Trump allegedly walked out of a screening, his response was telling; "_I think the bigger question is: Why did they buy two tickets and walk in?_"

Ostensibly a biopic of former Vice President Dick Cheney, _Vice_ argues that he was actually the _de facto_ President, with George W. Bush taking a back seat, particularly in the globally crucial years from 2001-2003. Very much a political satire in the vein of Decimus Iunius Iuvenalis and Jonathan Swift, or films such as Barry Levinson's _Wag the Dog_ and Joe Dante's _The Second Civil War_ (both 1997), _Vice_ eschews conventional narrative structure, breaks the fourth wall regularly, intercuts shots of fly-fishing and animals hunting into the middle of tense plot-heavy dialogue scenes, features several self-reflexive references to itself, has a false ending, has a scene in which characters speak in iambic pentameter, and in a deleted scene, the entire cast breaks into song. Much as was the case with recent "based on a true story" films such as Spike Lee's _BlacKkKlansman_ and Jason Reitman's _The Front Runner_ (both 2018), _Vice_ has one eye on the here and now, using Cheney's story as a vehicle to examine the current political situation in the US, positing that without the power-mad Dick Cheney and the Unitary Executive Theory, there would never have been a Donald Trump. However, although there are many individual moments of brilliance, the film is unsure if it's a straightforward biopic or an excoriating satire, ultimately finding a kind of ideological middle ground that mixes comedy with pathos, not always successfully.

Narrated by Kurt (Jesse Plemons), a fictitious veteran of the Afghanistan and Iraq Wars, who claims to have a unique connection to Cheney, the film begins in Wyoming in 1963 as a young Dick Cheney (Christian Bale) is arrested for drunk driving for the second time. It then cuts to the Presidential Emergency Operations Center in the immediate aftermath of 9/11, as Cheney orders the shooting down of any suspicious commercial airliners, despite President Bush (who was en route to Washington from Florida) not signing off on such an order. How Cheney got from being a drunk in 1963 to taking control of the government in 2001 is the film's primary focus, introducing us to a huge cast of characters (played by an extraordinary ensemble), all of whom feature in Cheney's rise to power in some manner – Lynne Vincent (Amy Adams), Cheney's fiancée and later wife; Donald Rumsfeld (Steve Carell), under whom Cheney worked from 1969, later White House Chief of Staff (1970-1971) and Secretary of Defense (1975-1977 and 2001-2006); Gerald Ford (Bill Camp), President (1974-1977), for whom Cheney was White House Chief of Staff; George H.W. Bush (John Hillner), President (1989-1993), for whom Cheney was Secretary for Defense; Liz (Lily Rabe) and Mary (Allison Pill), Cheney's two daughters; Roger Ailes (Kyle S. More), founder of Fox News; George W. Bush (Sam Rockwell), President (2001-2009), for whom Cheney was Vice President; Scooter Libby (Justin Kirk), Chief of Staff to the Vice President (2001-2005); David Addington (Don McManus), Cheney's legal counsel (2001-2005) and Chief of Staff to the Vice President (2005-2009); Colin Powell (Tyler Perry), Secretary of State (2001-2005); Condoleezza Rice (LiaGay Hamilton), National Security Advisor (2001-2005) and Secretary of State (2005-2009); Paul Wolfowitz (Eddie Marsan), Deputy Secretary of Defense (2001-2005); George Tenet (Stephen Adly Guirgis), Director of Central Intelligence (1996-2004); Karl Rove (Joseph Beck), Senior Advisor to the President (2001-2007); Trent Lott (Paul Perri), Senate Minority Leader (2001-2003); Jay Bybee (Brandon Firla), Assistant Attorney General (2001-2003); and John Yoo (Paul Yoo) Deputy Assistant Attorney General (2001-2003). Within this framework, the film hits all the beats you'd expect – the bombing of Cambodia (1969-1970); the formation of Al-Qaeda (1988); the outbreak of the Somali Civil War (1988); the invasion of Panama (1989); the Gulf War (1990-1991); Cheney's time as CEO of Halliburton (1995-2000); 9/11 and the invasion of Afghanistan (2001); the "Torture Memos" and "enhanced interrogation techniques" (2002); the invasion of Iraq (2003); the Plame affair (2003); the accidental shooting of Harry Whittington (2006); the rise of IS; Cheney's 13% approval rating upon leaving office (2009); his heart transplant (2012); and the breakdown in Mary's relationship with her family when Cheney gives Liz permission to oppose gay marriage whilst running for the Senate, despite Mary being a married to a woman (2013).

In writing Vice, McKay focused on five main sources – David Corn's _The Lies of George W. Bush: Mastering the Politics of Deception_ (2003), Ron Suskind's _The One Percent Doctrine: Deep Inside America's Pursuit of Its Enemies Since 9/11_ (2006), Michael Isikoff and David Corn's _Hubris: The Inside Story of Spin, Scandal, and the Selling of the Iraq War_ (2006), Barton Gellman's _Angler: The Cheney Vice Presidency_ (2008), and Jane Mayer's _The Dark Side: The Inside Story of How the War on Terror Turned Into a War on American Ideals_ (2008).

_Vice_ presents Cheney as devoid of ideology, with a Zelig-esque ability to alter his manner so as to best deal with whomever it is in whose company he finds himself. In this sense, his political ambition is portrayed as cynical and mercenary; McKay's Cheney has no interest in attaining power so as to influence policy or stimulate ideological change, he is obsessed only with power-for-power's sake. One of the most telling scenes in the film happens quite early when he learns that President Richard Nixon and National Security Advisor Henry Kissinger are planning to bomb Cambodia without going through Congress. Asking Rumsfeld, "_what do we believe?_", he is met by Rumsfeld laughing hysterically at being asked such a ridiculous question. Speaking to The New Yorker, McKay explains,

> _what I found – and I know there are people who disagree with this – was a surprising lack of ideology. I found beliefs that would flip and flop, based on what was convenient and what was strategically useful._

However, although the film presents Cheney as lacking ideology, it does show him as passionate when he adopts (and later usurps) the Unitary Executive Theory (essentially, the idea that the President should have virtually unchecked power to direct the Executive Branch, particularly during times of crisis). McKay tells _The New Yorker_,

> _at one point, he even says the President should have certain monarchical prerogatives._

Speaking to _ACLU_, he says of Cheney's adoption of the Theory,

> _you see it constantly throughout his career – his attempts to expand executive reach, expand executive authority, to operate without transparency, to operate with impunity._

Key lines in this respect include Cheney arguing, "_if the president does it, it's legal_", and, when discussing the issue of the US using torture, "_if the US does it, by definition, it can't be torture_".

Nowhere is his character shown as more ruthless than in a scene towards the end of the film. In 2013, Liz is running for the Senate when a TV advert from a group affiliated with the incumbent Senator for Wyoming, Mike Enzi, claimed that she "_aggressively promotes gay marriage_". Mary had been married to Heather Poe since 2012, and although Cheney and Liz knew it went against their party's doctrines, they had supported her. However, the day after the advert aired, Liz appeared on _Fox News Sunday_ and said she did not support gay marriage. The following day, Cheney and Lynne released a statement supporting Liz, and causing a rift between the family and Mary which remains to this day. The film features a scene the night before Liz goes on TV, in which she asks permission to say she opposes gay marriage. In a chilling moment lifted right out of Francis Ford Coppola's _The Godfather Part II_ (1974), Cheney indicates his approval with a single silent nod of his head. Speaking to _ACLU_ about this scene, McKay states,

> _that to me is what made it a complete and total tragedy and that's the final kind of tally, the final destructive count of power. Is what he did to the country, what he did to countries like Iraq, punching holes in the Geneva Convention, what he did to the checks and balances of our democracy, what he did to the spirit of the American voter, the spirit of the American nation. And then the final thing, the tools that he used_ […] _eventually took down his own family. So to me at that point the tragedy was complete on every level: personal, family, country, world._

Much as in _BlacKkKlansman_, _Vice_ concludes with a haunting montage that brings the story up to date, showing some of the long-term effects of the Bush-Cheney years (instability in the Middle East, irreparable damage to the environment, the rise of IS). In relation to the here and now, although Trump is never explicitly mentioned (and is only shown for a split second in archive footage), McKay is unafraid to admit that the film is not entirely focused on the past. Speaking to the _New York Times_ about Cheney's dismantling of executive checks on power, McKay states,

> _Cheney was the expert safecracker who opened up the safe, and now the orangutan is in there, throwing around the money and the jewels._

He also sees the film as something of a corrective, a reminder of just how bad it was during Bush's time in office, telling _ACLU_

> _somewhere along the line, Donald Trump got elected, and all of a sudden we started hearing people say, "Hey, I kind of miss George W. Bush. You know, he wasn't that bad, him and Cheney." And then I really felt like I got to make the movie. I was like, this is crazy that people are saying this._

As with McKay's previous film, _The Big Short_ (2015), _Vice_ is aesthetically audacious. While there are fewer self-reflexive celebratory cameos explaining difficult terminology in direct-to-camera monologues (sadly, there's no Margot Robbie in a bath this time around), the film is edited in such a way as to remind me of Oliver Stone's "horizontal editing" in films such as _JFK_ (1991), _Natural Born Killers_ (1994), _Nixon_ (1995), and _U-Turn_ (1997). It's no coincidence that Vice was cut by Hank Corwin, who cut all of the above except _JFK_. This style of hyperkinetic editing can be seen throughout the film. For example, as Chaney attempts to manipulate Bush into agreeing to give him more power, there are intercepts of fly-fishing. It's not subtle, but it is effective. Indeed, this recalls an earlier scene when Cheney is teaching his daughters to fish, explaining,

> _you have to find out what the fish wants, and then you use that to catch the fish._

Elsewhere, much as Stone uses Coke commercials and footage from old films in _Natural Born Killers_, Vice features excerpts from the Budweiser "Whassup?" commercial (1999) and _Survivor_. In another scene, when Cheney first learns of the Unitary Executive Theory from Antonin Scalia (Matthew Jacobs), he immediately realises it is his road to power, and the film cuts to a lion bringing down a gazelle. For me though, some of the most effective editing in the film is more conventional. One particularly strong example is as Bush declares war on Iraq, the camera tilts down to show his leg is shaking. The film then cuts to a shot of an Iraqi civilian's leg shaking as the bombs begin to drop.

Also similar to _The Big Short_ is the film's sense of humour, with a tone of irreverence established from the very beginning, as the opening legend states,

> _the following is a true story. Or as true as it can be given that Dick Cheney is known as one of the most secretive leaders in recent history. But we did our fucking best._

A particularly sardonic scene comes about an hour in, as the film shows Cheney stepping away from politics in 1993 and later turning down Bush when he asks him to be his running mate in 2000. At this point, the legend explains that Cheney had chosen his family over politics, and that he happily lived out his days in Wyoming, becoming known as a great philanthropist and fly fisherman. As the Cheneys gather around a family barbeque, triumphant music swells, and the closing credits start to roll, only for the movie to interrupt itself, pointing out that that's not what happened at all, and then continuing with the narrative. It's a very meta technique, and one which both mocks feel-good biopics, whilst also providing a sly criticism of Cheney himself – had he not returned in 2000, the world could have had this happy ending.

Another very funny sequence sees Cheney and Lynne in bed discussing whether or not he should accept Bush's offer, with the narrator explaining,

> _sadly there is no real way to know exactly what was going on with the Cheneys at this history-changing moment. We can't just snap into a Shakespearean soliloquy that dramatises every feeling and emotion. That's just not the way the world works._

This is immediately followed by Cheney and Lynne speaking in _faux_-Shakespearean blank verse ("_Hast blindness usurped vision in you my wife?_", "_Mine own blood and will are yours til pierc'd be the last soldier's breastplate, spilling open its jellied ruby treasures_") as they work themselves up into a sexual frenzy (although technically, this is a duologue, not a soliloquy). There is also a scene in which Cheney meets two oil executives, whose faces are blurred out, and whose names are bleeped every time they are spoken. In another scene, a waiter (Alfred Molina), reads from a menu that features various forms of Cheney-endorsed torture;

> _tonight, we're offering the enemy combatant, whereby a person is not a prisoner of war, or a criminal, which means, of course, that he has absolutely no protection under the law._

After listening to their options, Cheney gleefully declares, "_we'll take it all_". There is also a hilarious mid-credit scene, which sees a focus group descend into chaos when a conservative calls a liberal a "_libtard_", prompting a mass brawl. Ignoring the fight, however, are two young girls who are instead interested only in speculating as to the quality of the new _Fast & the Furious_ film.

For all that, however, _Vice_ isn't a patch on _The Big Short_, for a number of reasons. For example, whereas in _The Big Short_, the self-reflexive _Tristram Shandy_-style narrative structure worked to the film's advantage, providing a way into the complex story, here it has the exact opposite effect, oftentimes distracting from McKay's thematic concerns, preventing the film from focusing on telling us how (and why) Cheney exploited loopholes in executive power to restructure US foreign policy. McKay is also less successful at moving from scenes of quiet tragedy to scenes of comedy than he was in _The Big Short_.

The most egregious problem, however, is that the film fails to give any kind of psychological verisimilitude or interiority to Cheney. Presenting him in an almost robotic manner, there is very little on what drives him, depicting his various deeds without offering anything cogent in terms of his motivations. Is he simply an ideologically-weak opportunist? Is he an evil megalomaniac fuelled by a deeper purpose, and if so, what purpose, and how? Could it all really have been about power, viewing the global geopolitical sphere as his own personal playground and nothing more? And if the film is arguing this, suggesting that this man, responsible for so much pain and suffering, did it all simply because he liked power, isn't that to downplay his agency, to allow one to argue that he didn't really know how much damage he was causing? Depriving him of psychology weakens any attempt to censure his actions. The film's Cheney is ultimately unknowable, and that makes his acts more easily forgivable. The argument that it was all because of power and greed really does next-to-nothing to help explain the man. And in any case, if we accept the thesis that Cheney cared only for power, then surely he warrants serious moral scrutiny, not a self-reflexive and, at times, self-congratulatory narrative that assumes the audience agrees with it before it has even said anything.

_Vice_ traces all of Cheney's acts back to Lynne dressing him down when he was younger, suggesting that without her prodding, this unambitious two-time Yale dropout would never have gotten into politics in the first place (it's telling, perhaps, that Lynne is unenthusiastic when she learns Cheney is thinking of accepting Bush's offer to be his running mate, pointing out, "_the VP just sits around and waits for the president to die_"). But to reduce all of it to being told off by wife, seems far too easy, although it could, I suppose, be cited as an example of the banality of evil. Except that the film's Cheney is anything but banal. In fact, he's terrifying.

Cheney pressured the CIA to find links between Al-Qaeda and Saddam Hussein so as to justify invading Iraq. He oversaw the public relations campaign to build popular support for the war. He encouraged the torture of terror suspects all the while denying it was torture. He was responsible for the worst strategic blunder in US history, the growth of a domestic surveillance state, the dictatorialisation of the office of the President, and the deaths of 4,000 American troops and at least 100,000 Iraqi civilians, although possibly as many as 500,000. His contempt for and willingness to rewrite the rule of law makes him a precursor of Trump. Positing him as a man who was power-mad and little else, _Vice_ remains always on the outside, trying to listen through the wall, never managing to open the door and expose his actual inner workings. The comedy and structural experimentation make it entertaining as a film, but it tells us very little about Cheney that we didn't already know. Strip away the artifice, and you'll find it doesn't have a huge amount to say. Never attaining the scale of tragedy to which it clearly aspires, the film functions instead to remind critics of Bush's cabinet why they became critics of Bush's cabinet. In the end, rather than exposing Cheney's dark soul, the film argues that he doesn't have one. And that is a far less interesting thesis.



剧组人员

協調美術系 : Wyatt Gazel

特技協調員 : Patel Ayham
Skript Aufteilung :Calise Arkin

附圖片 : Staci Armelle
Co-Produzent : Church Kady

執行製片人 : Reno Maria

監督藝術總監 : Waqar Jesika

產生 : Baylen Simeon
Hersteller : Noémi Rikki

角 : Lacyann Fleming



Film kurz

花費 : $166,638,538

收入 : $265,827,037

分類 : 市場營銷好笑道德 - 受傷, 偽善 - 分離, 道德 - 流行的你兒子錄音

生產國 : 津巴布韋

生產 : BBC Wales



Vice 2018 小鴨 完整版 電影



《2018電影》Vice 完整電影在線免費, Vice[2018,HD]線上看, Vice20180p完整的電影在線, Vice∼【2018.HD.BD】. Vice2018-HD完整版本, Vice('2018)完整版在線

Vice 埃斯特(數學)演講-詩歌 |電影院|長片由 Taanta 和臭名昭著的椰子Lamia Liwsi aus dem Jahre 1995 mit Querida Ansel und Merle Aryana in den major role, der in DIC Entertainment Group und im Zoom Out 意 世界。 電影史是從 伯吉斯 Jiten 製造並在 aka Productions 大會摩納哥 在 10 。 二月 2000 在 29。 十月2007.